Of course that presupposes that the time stamp correctly identifies when this article was posted and also when the blog was started.
The time stamp on this post currently suggests that this post was made on Sunday 13th September 2015, which is, in fact, exactly a year into the future.
By that time this legal case will have been decided for some time.
Of course our "expert" may be a mite confused by the fact that the second post will have a date some years into the past but it will look like it's the first post, and then there will be a third post which will look as though it was posted as the second post.
I'm sure he will be able to explain all this to his client and the court when cross examined on it though.